Web page optimization. Website optimization

Go to content

Main menu:

Web page optimization.Website optimization

Website content optimization

      Content optimization one of important aspect in promotion of your website and in search engine optimization. How to define relevance of the document to certain search inquiry? Earlier search engines ranged pages, estimating their maintenance - texts. In particular, the great value was given to frequency of a key phrase - that is a percentage part of a keyword or several words in text.
      For example, if the user entered inquiry "the success formula" on the first positions documents where the given phrase met more often stood out. Certainly, today such way of ranging seems a bit naive. On the other hand, the document maintenance should be useful and valuable to visitors as the webmasters can easily change the maintenance of pages, being arranged under algorithms of search engines.
      Therefore modern search engines consider not only frequency, but also set of other parameters - keyword or phrase presence in headings, lists, texts of links of the menu. Moreover, search engines more and more attention give to reference ranging - that is to quantity and quality of links from other sites on the given resource. Nevertheless, if the site moves ahead on set of low-frequency inquiries or inquiries with a low competition, text optimization can yield good result. And to deduce a site on the top positions in delivery.
      We will consider questions of content optimization for search engine optimization . But it is important to consider that, finally, texts are created for visitors. Therefore they should be interesting not only to robots, but also real people who will read them. Important during optimization not to go too far. Key phrases should be intertwined harmoniously in the text and not cause tearing away from too frequent use in offers. How many percent the key phrase in text total amount should occupy?
      As already it has been told above, in the beginning search engines paid much attention to frequency of a keyword( keyphrase ) in the text. This parameter was defined on the basis of a percentage part of a word or a word combination in text l under the formula:

      KWD = (Quantity of repetitions of a keyword or a phrase / Total of words) * 100 %

      For example, if in the text on 100 words it is necessary 5 key frequency is equal 5 %. In case frequency of a key phrase the total of words shares on quantity of words in this phrase is calculated. For example, if in the text of 100 words and in it there are 3 times a phrase "warm rolls" frequency will be equal 3 / (100/2) = 6 %. But in real life it is a little differently.

website optimization

  For example, if in the text on 100 words it is necessary 5 key frequency is equal 5 %. In case frequency of a key phrase the total of words shares on quantity of words in this phrase is calculated. For example, if in the text of 100 words and in it there are 3 times a phrase "warm rolls" frequency will be equal 3 / (100/2) = 6 %. But in real life it is a little differently.
  The matter is that algorithms of search engines differently calculate frequency of a keyword or a phrase. Search engines consider not all words that influences the size of a denominator of the formula. For example, so-called stop words ( to, the, and) are not subject to the account. And each search engine approaches to their definition in own way. Nevertheless, webmasters constantly argue on optimum frequency of a keyword or a phrase in the text. The tolerance threshold considers an indicator in 6-8 %. If keyword meet in the text more often filters of search engines can join. A site can accuse of attempt of spam and lower in SERP.

  But in practice there are pages on which the density of keywords considerably exceeds 8 % that does not prevent to be to the document on the top positions in delivery. Therefore it is necessary to approach to definition of optimum frequency individually, analyzing similar indicators at sites of competitors. Other important aspect  - text volume on page. For example, there are two texts. In the first 500 words and the key phrase meets 10 times. In the second - 50 words and the key phrase meets only 1 time. Frequency identical - 2 %. But from the point of view of the common sense, the first content corresponds to the inquiry than to the second more. Search engines also look at content volume. From practice webmasters have deduced the optimum size of the text on one page, equal 300-500 words.

Meta Tags and search engine optimizaion

page optimization

  Let's consider use of meta tags for improving the ranking of  web pages in search engine results.
  Except density of keywords, search engines  consider their arrangement in various parts of the text. The biggest weight words in title, document headings (tags H1-H3) have, the fragments allocated fat or the italics. Is approximate the table of the importance various tags for search engines:

  • Title: 100

  • H1-H2: 50

  • Meta description: 50

  • Domain name: 30

  • URL / filename: 20

  • Bold or italic text: 20

  • The text beginning: 15

  • Simple use in the text: 10

  • Title attribute: 10

  • Meta keywords: 10

  • Alt attribute: 5


  These figures are received on the basis of empirical data, better to say, supervision. Any developers of search engines have not confirmed and have not denied this data. Nevertheless, it is impossible to trust the table blindly. First, search engines differently consider weight of tags. And at any moment developers can change factors for this or that element.
  Searchers, in particular, Google, look on URL. Use of keywords in a domain name can raise a site in search engine results.
  Besides, some search engines consider tags TT, EM, OL, LI, U and others. There is an opinion that tag STRONG has more weight than tag B. Arise a question what tag to use better - EM or I? And why nobody pays attention on tag CITE which is intended for registration of citations? Perhaps, it has more weight than EM and I together. Precisely answer this question developers of search engines can only, but they prefer to keep silence. Therefore practice and experience can confirm many assumptions only. Great value for content optimization play title and meta-tags.
  Search engines consider all the size long title and meta-tags, but only a certain part. For example, Google considers the first 70 symbols. For meta-description these indicators are equal 156. Description directly does not influence ranging, but often search engines use the maintenance of it as the description which accompanies each link in delivery. Interesting meta-description indirectly raises appeal of the link and quantity of transitions on it. For meta-keywords it is recommended to use no more than 50 words or 1000 symbols. There is an opinion that plays a role a word order in title. Words in the heading beginning have more weight than words in the end.
  Many webmasters do not give great value to work on the content optimization. Really, search engines consider hundreds factors at ranging of sites, in particular, quantity and quality of deep links. But, ignoring work on the content optimization, webmasters misses additional possibility to rise above competitors. On many sites are not used tags headings - H1, H2 etc. They are not pleasant to Owners of sites in the big size of a font. For example, by default in tag H1 the text is deduced in 24 size. But after all it is possible to register other size in style sheet CSS. Till now there are sites on which are not registered tags Title and meta-description. Or they standard for all pages or duplicate the section name. And after all tag Title search engines pay attention to the maintenance first of all! Moreover, the text in this tag serves as the link in search delivery. And on appeal Title depends, whether the visitor will pass to your site or not.
  Navigation - one more weak place. It was fashionable to make out navigation in the form of pictures earlier. But search engines are not able to read the text on images. Therefore it is more favorable to use text references in which keywords are included. They will raise density of phrases on page and weight of words in the text. It is not necessary to neglect alternative text to pictures. Search engines use the maintenance of tag ALT for search of pictures in the set subjects. Some searchers consider the alternative text at ranging of pages.
   The lists which are made out with the help tags OL or UL also influence weight of keywords. Lists should be applied and in aesthetic reasons. With their help it is possible to issue beautifully the menu, a sitemap and pages of catalogues.
  As practice shows, it is better to optimize each page under 2-3 keywords or phrases. For the main page it is necessary to choose the most frequency and competitive inquiries. With other things being equal (quantity and quality of links to a site) the optimized text becomes that factor which will deduce the main page above competitors. For minor pages it is possible to choose less frequency and competitive inquiries on which it is possible to take high positions only by means of text optimization. For each page it is extremely desirable to register unique title and meta-tags.
  There is still a specialized parameter of tag META which serves for management of a route of search spider. It is parameter "ROBOTS", it can accept values index/noidex, folow/nofollow: index/noindex to index/not to index the content of web page; follow/nofollow to follow/not to follow further under external links on the web page.

For example:

<META NAME = "ROBOTS" CONTENT = "index, nofollow">
<HEAD><end text>

In this case search robot will index the page maintenance, also will not go further on one of links from the given page. What for it is necessary? For example, on the given page links to useful resources which on your server do not lie are located. Really you want, that the robot has left on one of them and by that did not begin to index your site? Certainly is not present. This parameter of tag META very  useful. The majority of the most popular (though and not all) search engines it support.

Web page optimisation errors

  I think that some the web designer the same as also I, by optimization of the web page often commit errors or miss any aspect. And then it is necessary to come back, estimate already made, to eliminate defects, in general to spend an extra time. All it occurs not from ignorance, and that each separate page demands an individual approach and all is difficult so to a descent to make correctly.

   In given article I will consider the basic errors of content optimization.

1.    Wrong title.
   In tag title it is recommended to use only one exact occurrence of key inquiry right at the beginning. If advance by several inquiries make the text the most readable, instead of simply set of key phrases. Tag title should be registered for each page and to be unique.
Absence tag <H1> on page. This tag on a number with title is very important and should include exact occurrence of a keyword.

2.    The structure of headings is wrong.
   Though the error and not fatal, but nevertheless can affect indexing of pages of a site and ranging in PS  to the worst. Headings should follow correctly, i.e. at first goes tag <H1>, and in one copy, then tag  <H2> etc. in any quantities.

3.    Use others tags in <H1>.
   It is necessary to avoid here such designs: <h1> <span> Errors of internal optimization <span> </h1> or  to conclude links in <H1>. It considerably reduces weight of tag. Earlier I committed a similar error and have paid with bad ranging of pages of a site.

4.    Graphic or Flash heading.
    On the main page of a site it is necessary to do heading text and to conclude it in tag<H1> or to duplicate graphic heading by the text.

5.    Absence of pictures and tags in them.
   By means of images it is possible to collect not bad the additional traffic from search in pictures. Also it is necessary to register attribute ALT always.

6.    Wrong internal links (or its absence).
   At the expense of correct internal links it is possible to promote on LF to inquiries. Superfluous  internal links that is bad. On page there should not be more than 100 internal links. So the uncle bequeaths us Google. Is better to refer on 3-5 articles approaching on subjects.

7.    A Considerable quantity of external links.
   It reduces page weight, trust of resource also decreases. Is better to close links in nofollow, which are necessary only for users.

8.    Spamdeksing.
   It is not necessary to use methods of "black optimization" for content optimization: one pixel  links, a hidden text. Searchers define today similar methods very easily and impose filters.
    Like everything, I hope that has helped someone to avoid these errors of content optimization.



Back to content | Back to main menu